Fx 6300 gaming

This does everything well for the price. If you get a quality FX mobo and add a decent cooler this thing will overclock like you wouldn't believe making a useful CPU still in Handed on to my mother as her most powerful PC.

Runs extremely hot. The 6 Cores don't really made themselves known, even when rendering video. It would take nearly 45 minutes to render a 20 minute video at p My new ryzen chip cuts that in half. In all honesty, this chip is just old and tired. If you can get it for suuuuuper cheap, and are going to overclock the hell out of it, go for it. But if you're looking to build a first PC, go with an intel chip of the same year or newer, or a new ryzen chip.

Comparing with G, this CPU is best for general purpose multitasking as well as gaming with overclocking. Highly recommended. This CPU might seem underpowered, but it's insanely easy to overclock.

I personally was able to get away with a staggering MHz on stock cooling, when changing the VCore to 1. Bear in mind, the stock voltage is 1.

Not to mention the fact that Cool 'n' Quiet is enabled, and is working fully. Overclocking Results:. Bus speed was increased to MHz. Thermals: Thermals were actually very nice despite the fact that is on stock cooling. Under full load on all cores, reverting to base clock, the CPU reaches 64C. It's close to the Tj max, but not enough to constitute throttling. Nice job, AMD. This CPU has remained stable for almost two straight years, one of which it has spent overclocked.

They can't? Well, I guess I'm lucky. C MY FX to 4. See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank. Save as guest. Average Bench: Based on , user benchmarks. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list. Strengths Avg. Memory Latency Single Core Mixed Speed This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed Pts. Average Bench Based on , samples. Rank USA-User, 2 hrs ago. USA-User, 11 mins ago. USA-User, 25 mins ago. CHE-User, 1 hr ago. Battle cruiser. Bench your build Size up your PC in less than a minute. How it works - Download and run UserBenchMark.

Group Test Results Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison. Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance. Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers. Share a related link. DEU-User level 5, IND-User level 3, Terrible edit your comment Add link 2 months ago.

CAN-User level 4, Good 1 month ago. IDN-User level 4, Excellent 5 days ago. AUS-User level 3, Average 2 years ago. ESP-User level 3, Excellent 9 months ago. HUN-User level 2, Good 4 days ago. BGR-User level 2, Excellent 2 years ago. CPUPro level 1, Poor 8 years ago. It is capable of handling multiple intensive apps andfeatures a speed frequency of 3. The FX -6xxxs aren't actually 6 cores.

Theyare 3 modules and 6 threads 2 threads shares the samecomponents that usually makes a core basically, it's a core that has two threads.

Kinda like Intel'sHyperthreading, but a bit "better". The reason why the FX - is marketed as a 6 - core isbecause of the marketing. The good news though is that the FX - is still perfect for a budget build. The bigbucks you save on this processor can be better spent on otherperipherals and hardware. Let's get straight into the benchmarksand scores. With PassMark, it is immediately evident that singlecore performance of the FX is poor. The AMD Ryzen 5 is our pick as the bestprocessor you can buy today.

AMD may have usurped thetop spot for the best CPU for gaming with its latestRyzen processors , but it still has competition fromIntel's Coffee Lake chips in the gaming department. The line aimedat competing with the Intel Core line of desktop processors, and inparticular the Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridgearchitectures. In terms of overall gaming performance, the IntelCore iU 1. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneckmore powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

AMD FX When it comes to a comparisonbetween the Intel Core i7 K and the AMD FX , it means we are talking about two processors of great qualityand power. The dividing point between the two powerhouses is,however, the fact that the K has an integrated GPU whereas the FX does not. There's no straightforward answer to this.

It depends onhow well the chip's single threaded performance is. For example, a 3. It really depends between which two youare picking between. At stock speeds, the FX - is plenty toget the job done, and power consumption in gaming doesn't increaseappreciably as the result of overclocking.

Much like the FX , going past 4.